Yep, that is quite
possibly true, but it is also quite possibly a chicken's way of not taking a
stand. I have never posted a blog about politics except to say that I
wish people would be more respectful of each other when they disagree. I still
feel strongly about that. I also feel strongly about all the people who
constantly post memes they copy and paste without checking their validity. I
also feel strongly about people who think their thoughts are the only valid ones
and everyone else is just plain stupid for not agreeing.
My tolerance for that kind of thinking is zero. I have very
strong political views and I am not stupid. The mere fact that you disagree
with my views does not make you stupid, either. It makes you different than me.
That's all. Just different.
The one thing I will
state openly and often is that whoever is currently sitting, or who has
previously held the office of President of the United States, will get my
respect and I will not speak harshly of them. They are or were MY President and
the office alone, the fact that the majority of my fellow Americans voted for
and thereby elected them to office is enough to earn and hold my respect. I may
or may not like the actions they take or the inaction they missed, but I will
respect and speak respectfully about them. This is so missing from our society
today and I think the internet is partially to blame for this. It's much easier
to be disrespectful by typing and putting it out there with no face to face ~
even with the people you are calling stupid and uninformed.
I will not do that now
nor will I do that in the future. I will type exactly what I would say to your
face and I will consider all of your comments as your replies to my words.
Isn't that a fair and balanced way to handle political differences? As a
side note, it might even be beneficial to each of us to actually read (listen)
to each other with an open mind. There could be some truths we hadn't
considered. Or there could be just a bunch more "talking" points
reiterated from some web site put up by the supporting group of the republicans
or the democrats. That will gain neither of us anything. But it could happen,
nonetheless.
I am basically a
liberal. I believe we are our brother's keepers. I therefore, generally fall to
the Democratic candidate based on the history of the Democratic party being
more likely to provide for people who need help and expecting those of us who
can financially do so, to help in a fair way to give those who need what they
need. I wish churches and charities could do it all, but they aren't able, so
yes, I believe our governments, both state and federal, should provide basic
human needs to anyone who temporarily or permanently needs a hand up. Yes, I am
that person who still feels like people of the United States should not live in
squalor and should not go to bed hungry. They should not be homeless, without
choice. I believe I should pay enough taxes to make that happen. I am willing
to pay for federal and state programs to ensure our citizens live a decent life
and are able to acquire a job that they are able to perform. Training should be
available at no cost to those who need it to secure such a job. I am willing to
fund this proportionately to my income.
I am fully in favor of
making certain social security payments are available to all who pay into the
fund. I am fine with spousal benefits for widows and widowers who shared the
life of a working productive person who paid into the SS fund during their
working years. I am in favor of this program and a payment being based on
the amount the worker has paid in over their lifetime. I am in favor of taking
care of our seniors who have given most of their lives and upon reaching age 62
wish to retire and collect their Social Security Insurance.
They are entitled to
this program and these payments. Have a fit, if you like, about these being
called entitlements and deciding that means a free handout, but know this
before you stroke out about that wording,
entitle: n, v
1) give just claim or
right,
give a title to,
allow, permit;
make eligible, qualify; authorize, empower.
2) name, call
This is according to
Webster.
And dictionary.com says
3. the right to guaranteed benefits under a government program, as Social
So...my take on this big controversy is like so many other
things. It is just a HOT SPOT phrase with NO basis for truth.
Social Security and Medicare are entitlements! They are
programs we are entitled to because we are CLAIMING our own money which the
government has been holding for us in trust.
STOP BEING OUTRAGED ABOUT THE USE OF THAT PHRASE....IT IS
ACCURATE.
So now my question is ~ which candidate will most likely give me
the country I want to live in?
My answer is Barack Obama with the help of a congress dedicated
to getting things done. I am voting against every incumbent that is
up for re-election on the Rep side of the ticket. I am looking for
congressional support with enough condescending opinions to equate to good,
solid results. I don't want a bunch of "yes" men, I want men and
women who will give good serious thought to issues and choose what is right and
best for their constituents. We don't have that now. We have an entire block of
congressional republicans voting to keep Obama to one term. Politics over
people. Cannot continue.
Gov. Romney speaks often of not growing up privileged. I'm
sorry, compared to my life, he was very privileged. He may have given away
his inheritance from his father, but not before he used the money
from the stocks his father gave him to achieve his college degree and support
his wife and children. He used the money his father gave him in the form of
stocks for years and was never in jeopardy of not being able to feed his family
or pay a bill. Compared to me and most of my friends, that is privileged. So I
find it hard to imagine he could ever imagine life without enough food, without
enough money for the utility company and having the heat shut off in winter or
the pills you need to stay alive not being purchased because the rent is due.
Owning a home is out of the question for many people now, it was never out of
the question for the Romney's. How can anyone expect him to have any notion of
what we are really living without here in the heartland. I can't imagine never
having to even give these things a second thought, so I can't expect the
Romney's to get my life style either.
I DO expect the Obama's to get it. They lived it. They were
without money and worked to pay off student loans, their parents did not give
them stocks to draw interest and dividends from to pay for their expenses. They
do get what is going on here and they also care. I'm not convinced by Romney's
plan that he cares so much about us as he cares about keeping a Republican
congress to support his trickledown economics plan moving forward. It has never
worked and isn't economically sound.
Quoting Clinton...”it's arithmetic.” It doesn't work and way too
many details are missing. We have a month left and I am looking at my absentee
ballot right in front of me, now. I am ready after the debate last night to
announce Romney did not win that debate, because he didn't tell me anything new
or anything that made sense to me concerning my social security, future Medicare
or tax improvements. My health insurance is a main concern to me and he says
give it back to the states. My state is in big, big financial trouble and it
can't afford to help me out with insurance. And it won't help me anyway; we
have a Republican Governor who believes everyone can have insurance, if they
want it.
Very long...sorry....you probably checked out a long time
ago....but I'm done now and I'm listening. The floor belongs to you....be
kind.
Just so you know, if you leave a rude or hateful comment, I will
delete it.
Jo